A critical analysis of Liquidity, Profitability and Efficiency

A critical analysis of Liquidity, Profitability and Efficiency the industry average of current ratio is 2.2:1.company A is showing better current ratio of 2.63 as compared to industry average of 2.2 which mean that the company A bears a greater ability to paid its bills . Company B and C have less current ratio as compared to the industry average which means that the performance of these companies are not up to standard however company Cs current ratio is slightly greater than the industry average which shows that the performance of company C is satisfactory. The industry average of quick ratio is 1.5 whiles the average quick ratios of companies A B and C are 1.99, 1.54 and 1.71 respectively which shows that the said companies posses a greater ability to pay their bills however only the company D quick ratio is slightly less than the industry average ratio which is 1.48 which mean the company needs to review its liquidity plans . PROFITABILITY The industrys average of ROCE is 15% and the average ROCE of companies A Is 19.3%, company B is 21.26%, company C is 28.24% and company D is 31.13 which means that the companies are earning a good return on their capital employed. Company C and D gross profit ratios are 53.14% and 56% which are comparatively better than the industrys average of 48% however company B gross profit ratio is 48% which equals the industrys average but company A GP ratio is 43.75% which is less than the industrys average. It is suggested that the company A should reduce its cost of sale or increase its sales revenue. The industrys average of operating profit ratio is 40% unfortunately company A and B both have low operating profit ratio which are 33.75% and 38.28% respectively which indicates that both companies A and B has low control in their operating expenses on the other hand companies C and D have better operating profit ratios which are 46.63% and 48.73 showing that the management of both companies bears a good control on their expenses. EFFICIENCY Companies A B and C have high stock turn over which are 63.88, 75.43 and 71.22 all three companies exceeds the industrys average of 35 days which means that there could be a problem in their demand and supply due to which companies inventory is not easily converted into finish goods hence there are not able to effectively sale their products. Note: Company D stock turn over ratio cannot be calculated because of unavailability of required data. The industrys average of total turnover ratio is 0.9 time and in this regard all the four companies have good total turnover ratio which are 0.95, 0.93, 1.01 and 1.06 showing the good return on their assets. INVESTMENT There is no such parameter by which one can compare the earning per share with the industrys standards. However we can compare EPS among the four companies that EPS of companies C and D are 0.98 and 0.88 is comparatively good than the companies A and B of 0.54 and 0.56 respectively. As far as the position of best company is concerned company D is said to be the best company because of better ROCE 31.13 which means the company is earning highest profitability, EPS 0.88 indicated earning per share is very good and dividend cover 3.68 the shareholders of the company receiving handsome dividend. ANSWER 1 (B) Company D shows a good charm for the shareholders because its earning per share is higher is 0.88 as compare to other companies like A and B but slightly less to company C which EPS is 0.98 however company D also have better dividend cover of 3.68 which depicts that it is paying its shareholder more than any other said company pay however company C once again a big rival in payment of dividend has a dividend cover of 3.38. On the other hand management of company D plays a remarkable role in utilising the shareholders funds hence reducing the long-term liabilities option because of less long term liabilities company D also has to pay less amount of interest on these loans as compare to other companies. Therefore it is suggested to invest in company D from shareholder perspective. ANSWER 2(a) ANSWER 2 (A) CRITICAL ANALYSIS The net present value is a discounted cash flow approach to capital budgeting. The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposals net cash flow less the proposals initial cash outflow. If an investment projects net present value is zero or more, the project is accepted, if not, it is rejected. In this case of Tridad ltd the NPV is -6384.24 which means the value is less than zero therefore the project is not viable for the company. ANSWER 2(B) The internal rate of return is 13% ANSWER 2(C) If a refinancing option (overseas loan) were to be taken then there are many risks that the company might face like FINANCIAL RISKS: forex risk hedges overseas government policies WAYS TO DEAL : There are couple of ways which can be use to deal with the said financial risks Loan with fixed interest rate Buy futures which will give the company assurity of the expected future cash outflow- Reduces uncertainty and any cash problems that could be used due to this. ANSWER 3(A) Proposed profit 91,552 Proposed profit 78,832 Break-even hours 1,393 Break-even hours 1,574 Break-even Sales 208,955 Break-even Sales 340,000 ANSWER 3 (B) Boris Plc has an operating profit of 91552 in scenario 1 and 78832 in scenario 2 at the sale turnover of 345600 and 497664 in scenario 1 and 2 respectively. For achieving the break-even at least 1393 hours in scenario 1 and 1574 hours in scenario 2 have to be sold out so that variable cost can be observed. Break-even techniques are based on marginal costing therefore fixed cost plays a significant role companys operating results and performance. In the long haul fixed cost needs to be fully observed hence absorption costing approach is critical to be planned in the long term decision making plan.

Lemurs of Madagascar

Lemurs of Madagascar Name: Course: Tutor: Date: Lemurs of Madagascar 1. Madagascar biome is a tropical rain forest. The main characteristic of a tropical rain forest biome is the presence of Warm temperatures throughout the year. In a tropical rain forest biome, there are three layers. These layers include the top trees, followed by the canopy layer characterized by dens leaves hence low light penetration and the third layer are the ground layer. The ground layer lacks any vegetation owing to the low amount of sunlight reaching it due to the dense canopy layer. 2. Changes happening in Madagascar pose challenges to lemurs in the island.The main changes that affect the lemurs include the effects of agricultural activities on the environment. Forestland conversion for agricultural use including the creation of pastureland, cropland, and degradation of the soil due to fire and clearing by humans is the agricultural changes on Madagascar. Soil erosion caused by slash-and-burn farming also forms the other changes in Madagascar that brings forth challenges to lemurs. As a conclusion, high deforestation rate and increased human population and erosion form the main changes that challenge the existence of lemurs in Madagascar. 3.The lemurs that are adapting well with the changes in Madagascar are the ones with the ability to live in an altered habitat. (This is a habitat with secondary characteristics owing to human activities in the island). These include the ring-tailed lemur lemma catta and sifakas, but between the two, the ring-tailed lemma catta is adapting better to changes in the ecosystem. The fossil lemurs’ disappearance in the island was due to inability to adapt well to the changes. The other types of lemurs that have disappeared due to change in the habitat include Palaeopropithecus, Daubentonia robusta, Archaeiindris fontoynonti and Megaladapis edwardsi. . A generalist behavioral type is required of the lemurs in Madagascar to be able to cope with the change s in the island for their adaptation and survival. The species favored in this criterion are sifakas and lemur catta, which are adapting well to the changes. Other behavioral characteristics required include being terrestrial for them to adapt well with the changes as depicted by the lemur catta. Physical characteristics that improve adaptation to the changes include ability to take advantage of changes by feeding on crops, tourist handouts, insects, flowers, and fruits. . Lemurs might not develop to adapt to changes in Madagascar because they lived on trees and the deforestation affects their form of livelihood. The reduction in the soil’s ability to support the vegetation that forms the main food for the lemurs is another reason owing to the high rates of soil erosion and degradation. Similarly, human actions in the highland affect their ability to adapt with the changes hence another reason for the inability to adapt to changes in the habitat. 6. The water cycle is the biochemical cycle that may be altered by activities in Madagascar.An alteration on the water cycle takes the following pattern owing to the activities in mainly deforestation and soil erosion and degradation. Cutting of rain forests results in low moisture transpiration to the atmosphere. The result is a reduction in the cloud cover, diminished precipitation, and lead to drought in the area. The replacement of the forests requires water hence an impossible occurrence when there is drought in the area. Reference â€Å"Lemurs in Madagascar: Surviving on an Island of Change. † Films Media Group, 2006. Films On Demand.

Law for Manager Essay

The partnership act 1890 governs the relationship of the persons and the outside world. And in respect of dissolution; if there is no partnership agreement, the partnership act set out the rights and duties of the partners. Such rights and duties (by act or agreement) may be varies by the consent of all partners. (S 19). ‘The relation which subsists between persons carrying on a business in common with a view to profit. ’ Under S24 (5) ‘in common’ means every partner has a say in the firm. The members are only liable for their subscription unless the partnership agreement says otherwise. Saywell V Rope [1979] the wives are not in the partnership as no evidence suggested. ‘Person’ includes a corporation as well as individuals. Companies can enter partnership. ‘With a view to profit’ means certain organisations are excluded. E. g. club or society has no view to profit. Pitreavie Golf Club V Penman [1934] creditor sue under partnership, held, Club’s motivation was to allow member to play not share in profit. ‘Business’ included every trade, occupation and profession. Keith Spicer Ltd V Mansell [1970] Claimant sue the partnership for debt owned, held, there were no partnership so claim failed. Because def carrying on business with no view to profit. It is important to determine whether a partnership exists. For tax reason. When acting in the course of business, the company will bind the other partners to outsiders. S. 24 right to share in profit, management, duties and faith since the arrangement is uberrimae fidei. S. 35 dissolution. If not acting in good faith then the court can dissolve the partnership. S. 28 duty to disclose, bond to render true account of all things affecting the partnership to any partners or their legal representatives. Law V Law [1905] – After the sales agreement there is a partnership asset that was not hidden from the account. But W had lost the right to avoid the contract as he takes the money while knowing disclosure had not made. Held: the agreement to sell shares is avoidable. The contract may be verbally, written or in deed. Basic: A partnership is not a company since it is not incorporated; therefore it has no legal personality separate from its members. Partnership may be implied by conduct where a ‘person holds himself out’ as being a partner. Then he will be liable for the debt incurred S. 4 Under the Rules of the Supreme Court 1965, the partners may be sued in the firm’s name. In KHAN & OTHERS V MIAH & OTHERS [2000] HL confirmed that partnership begins at the point of agreement, not the point when the trading starts. S. 5 each partner is an agent for the firm, has the power to bind the firm by his conduct. The partner is agent as far as he’s acting on the firm’s ordinary activities. Mercantile Credit Co V Garrod [1962] – G was sleeping partner and partnership agreement prohibited the sale of cars which P did. Held: G was bound by contract by virtue of S. making the contract was the doing of an ‘act for carrying on in the usual way business kind carried on by the firm. ’ S 29 (1) every partner must account to the firm for any benefit made by him from any transaction concerning the partnership, it property, name or business connection. Bentley V Craven [1853] C brought products at low price but sell them to the firm at wholesale rate. Held: C can’t retain the profit from these transaction and profit need to hand to the firms. C had used partnership asset, his position to make profit. No person may be introducing as a partner without the consent of all partners. Consent is implied by the other partner when they sign the article. Any different concerning the running of the business, it must be resolved by a majority vote of the partners. If a fundamental change is proposed, requires consent of all partners. S. 9 every partner is liable jointly with the other partner for all debts and obligation of the firm. The civil liability Act 1978 provided that judgement recovered against any person liable jointly with another, shall not be an action brought against the other. Business name. The firm’s name can’t be used to fraudulently imply that the business is identical with another business. A person’s business suffers in the same name/similar name may bring a ‘passing off’ action and obtain an injunction stopping the defendant. ANNABEL’S (BERKELEY SQUARE) Ltd . VG. SCHOEK[1972] S. 30 If any partner without the consent of the others, carries on business of the same nature as and competing with that of the firm, he must account for and pay over all profits made in that business. In the absence of any agreement to the contrary, a partner can carrying a non-competing business which does not involve the use of the firm’s property. Croft V Day [1843] Mr Day uses the same trade name as the other in the same street. Held: the injunction was granted preventing the new firm from trading under the name Day and Martin, the intention of the new firm was to deceive the public. Under S. 34 it is a c riminal offence for a partnership to use the word ‘limited or ‘ltd’ in its name. Partnership agreement terms: Name of partners; Date on the start and end of the partnership; How profit and loss being shared; How much may each partner draw monthly; At which bank the partner maintain its account; Principal asset; Submission of disputes to arbitration; The partnership is based on agreement and they are free to alter them. S. 9 say the decision may be made unanimously; a partnership can’t be formed for an illegal purpose. Types of partnership: 1) General partner takes active role in the daily management and has share in the loss and profit. 2) Sleeping partner contributes capital, take share in profit and liable for debt. But he does not take part in daily management. 3) A partner by holding out is not a true partner in the firm. He’s liable for financial obligation of the firm. MARTYN V GRAY [1863] Under S. 14 a person can become liable for debt if he by word or conduct represent or other to represent that he’s a partner. E. g. his name on the firm’ letter. ) Salaried partner is an employee becomes ‘holding out’, he received salary and bonus depends on the profit. The 1890 Act does not deal with them. 4) LLP is a member under the LLP Act 2000. Change of partners. The death of the partner may dissolve the partnership, but the agreement should allow the partnership continue between the other partners. On the death of the partner, the estate is not liable for debts incu rred after his death, even if the creditor was unaware of his death. S 17 (1) New partners are not liable for debts before they joint the partnership. The right to sue a new partner may be acquired by novation. Where an agreement between the creditor; the new agreement and the old firm is made, and the original contract is therefore discharged, and the new firm is accepting the liability for the debt. Byrne V Reid [1902] the claimant can introduce his son as partner when they are 21, held, other partner could not refuse because this is layout in the partnership agreement. The retirement of a partner: S. 17(2) He may be discharged from any existing liability by agreement (novation) between him, the firm and the creditors. Creditors are not force to accept novation and may still regard the retiring partner as liable for debt. The retiring partner can get compensation from the other partner. Under S. 36, the retiring partner will be liable for debt if: 1)To person dealt before his retirement unless given written notice that he’s no longer a partner or 2)To person who had no previous dealing with the firm before but know the composition before retirement. Unless the retirement person has given notice or had advertised in the London Gazette. Such notice is effective without consent. Liability for wrongs: 1)S 10 provides that any wrongful act or omission of any partner acting in the course of the business or with authority of co-partners. Any loss or injury is caused to person which is not a partner. The firm is liable to the same extent as the partner committing the wrong. This liability is jointly and several. 2) In HAMLYN V HOUSTON & Co [1905] a firm was liable to compensate a claimant where one of the partners had bribed a clerk employed by the claimant in order to obtain information about a rival’s business. 3) The firm will be vicariously liable for the torts committed by its employees in the course of their employment. 4) Lloyd V Grace, Smith & Co [1912]. Advantages of partnership: Uphold of capital, being responsible, share expertise, share resources, share profit and flexibility. Disadvantages of partnership: Conflict, jointly and severally liability, sharing debt/loss. Differences: 1) A company is a type of corporation, registered under company legislation. Company act 2006. The members of the company may have limited liability. The company’s debt belongs to the company not the shareholders, even if the company is insolvent. 2) A partnership is ‘the relationship which subsists between persons carrying a business with a view to profit. ’ S 1 Partnership act 1890. It’s an unincorporated association, having no separate legal personality from the partners. It may have firm’s name but not corporate status. Partners are responsible for the acts of the firm. Partners have unlimited liability and responsible for partnership’s debt. 3) LLP is registered at the companies’ house and received a certificate of incorporation. LLP is corporate bodies having separate personality from their members. LLP is personally liable to the third party for wrongful acts and might be liable in the insolvency. They are tax as partnership, flexible, trading disclose, accounting and filing similar to the company. They can also lend and raise floating charge. Perpetual succession 1) A company has perpetual succession; it is not affected by the death of the shareholders or change ownership of its shares. It continues to exist until it wound up by court/its members. 2) A partnership may be terminated on the death, retirement, bankruptcy or insanity of a partner. 3) LLP is incorporated, so not affected by the death etc. of a partner. His share may be inherited but the beneficiary will not be able to take part in management, only share in profit. A company has separate legal personality from its members. Salomon V Salomon & Co [1897], Lee V Lee’s air farm Ltd [1961], Macaura V Northern Insurance [1925], Cox V Coulsons [1916] – An actor shoot an audience in accident and claimant sue for damage in the partnership of the theatre (def) and theatrical company. Held: def is not in partnership with the actors company so not liable, neither of them are agent. Corporate veil can be lifted where there’s evidence of fraud/illegality. Gilford Motor Co V Horne [1933], Daimler Co Ltd V Continental Tyre Co [1916] (War time), Chandler V Cape Plc. Civil law-compensation; Criminal law –retribution/punishment. Lift corporate veil to target parent company; but difficult, usually subsidiary. Ownership; Separate ownership and management in a company; Small company has ownership and management in the hands of CEO; in a partnership there’s unity of ownership and control. All partners have right to management. Accounts; Company accounts have to be laid before the general meeting, published and audited. They are open to public inspection; Partnership accounts are not subject to public inspection and no need audited; LLP account need auditor’s report and have be sent annually to company’s house and to each member. Tax liability; Corporation tax paid on company’s profit, income tax by shareholders on dividend; Income tax is paid by partners as self-employed; LLP are tax as partnership. Shares. 1) Shares in listed companies re freely transferable. Private companies may impose restriction on transferring oh shares. Company can issue shares of different class with right attached to the shares. 2) A partners share is not freely transferable. New partner can be introduced with consent of all partners. In the absence of agreement, all partners have equal rights regarding the firm’s affairs and shares in capital, profit and losses. 3) a member of LLP may leave by agreement or by given notice. (S. 43 of the 2000 act) The firm is not dissolving on the departure of the member so no shares in the LLP’s assets. Unless agreement provides otherwise. Formalities: 1) To form a company requires registration to be complied with payment of fees. During lifetime of the company there are administrative formalities to be complied. Certain information (change of article/special resolution) need to submit to registrar. Information about a company’s affairs is readily available at company’s house or company’s registered office.  This also applies to LLP. 2) The formation of partnership has no legal requirement to be complied. But the business names act 1985 applies the partnership being based on agreement between the partners. No requirement for partnership except those affecting the business. E. g. registration for VAT, return of profit from HMRC. The public has no right to access material concerning partnership affairs. 3) LLP required submitting an annual return and accounts to companies’ house and keeping accounts in accordance with company legislation and daily records disclosing the financial position of the firm. The veil of incorporation, it was established in Salomon that a registered company is a legal person separate from its members. This principle may be referred to as ‘the veil of incorporation’. In general the law will not go behind the separate personality of the company to its members. Restated by Lightman J in Acatos and Hutcheson Plc V Watson [1995]. Principle of separate identity should be upheld unless there was a specific statutory provision or some other contractual term or common law principle to the contrary. Therefore, when the company is incorporated the veil of incorporation comes down, giving the company a separate legal personality from its members. Fraudulent trading, S. 213 of the insolvency act 1986: 1) If it appears that ‘any business of the company has been carried on with intent to defraud creditors of the company or of any other person, or for any fraudulent. 2) Purpose ‘it may order that ‘any persons who were knowingly parties to the carrying on of the business in the manner above mentioned are to be liable to make contributions to the company’s assets as the court thinks proper. 3) S. 993 CA 2006 Criminal offences of fraudulent trading. 3) High standard of proof. S213 of the IA 1986 provides that if in the winding up of a company it appears that the business has been carried on with the intent to defraud creditors or for any fraudulent purpose, the court, on the application of the liquidator, may declare that any persons who were knowingly parties to the fraudulent trading shall make such contributions to the company’s assets as the court thinks fit. ) S214 of the IA 1986 provides that where the liquidator of a company can show that D prior to liquidation, knew or ought to have known that there was no reasonable prospect that the company could avoid insolvent liquidation, and did not take steps to minimise the loss to creditors, the court may require D to make personal contribution to the company’s assets. Does not have to be dishonest, unreasonable behaviour or negligence. Reproduce Marketing Consortium Ltd [1989] Company become insolvent Ds directors were not dishonest but failed to take action. Held: the directors know that liquidation will occur, but fail to minimise loss during the disposal of assets. 5) S216 of the IA 1986 provides a criminal offence is committed. Directors or shadow directors during the 12 months prior to the company’s insolvent liquidation who concerns himself during the next 5 yrs in the formation or management of the business with a name similar to the earlier company. S 217 imposes personal liability on such a person for the debts and liabilities of the second company. Ricketts V AD Valorem Factors [2003]. ) Under S15 of the Company directors disqualification Act 1986, a person who has been disqualified continue acting in the management of a company will b e liable for the debts of the company contracted during that period. He can be guilty of a criminal offence under S13. Lifting the veil 1) Disqualified director. S. 15 of the company directors disqualification Act 1986, where disqualified from being a directors in contravention of disqualification. D liable for all debts of the company which were incurred when he was so acting. The same applies to the person who knowingly acts on the instructions of a disqualified person. ) S. 122(1) of the Insolvency Act 1986 petition to wind up a company on the grounds above. That it would be just and equitable to do so. For instance the court might look into why the company was formed. 3) Company name: S349 companies act 1985. E. g. directors or secretary issues or signs on behalf of the company, a bill of exchange or order for goods under the company’s name incorrectly stated; they are liable if the company defaults. 4) Penrose V Martyr [1858]-a company’s secretary accepts a ‘bill’ drawn on the company’s name on which the name was incorrectly written. The company defaulted. Held: The secretary was personally liable. 5) Trading certificate. Where no certificate has been obtained to enable a public company to commence trading, the directors commit a criminal offence and are personally liable to indemnify the other party for loss if the company defaults. However, failure to obtain the certificate does not affect the validity of any contract. Judgement. It is difficult to be precise about the circumstances when a judge will be prepared to lift the veil of incorporation. In Wolfson V Strathclyde Regional Council [1978] the COA laid down the principal that it is only permissible for a court to lift the veil where ‘special circumstances exist indicating that the company is a mere facade concealing the true facts. Gilford Motor Company Ltd V Horne [1933], Jones V Lipman [1962], DHN Ltd V Strathclyde RC [1978], Adams V Cape Industries Plc and Another [1991]. Judges lift veil to reveal fraud, sharp practice, oppression and illegality. Judge have lifted the veil in the: 1) Alien enemies. During war time, where a company is control by enemy aliens contract will be unenforceable by the company. A company registered in the UK may be an alien enemy if those in control to its affairs are alien enemies. Daimler Co. Ltd V Continental tyre and Rubber Co Ltd [1916]. 2) Where company is formed to enable persons to evade existing liability there’s abuse of company law. Gilford Motor Co Ltd Horne [1933] an ex employee was personally bound by a valid restraint of trade from approaching his former firm’s customers. He set up new company to solicit customers of his previous employer. Held: The Company was a mere sham to cloak the wrong doings of the director and the court grant the injunction against the new company as well as against him. ) Lord Denning as prepared to life the veil in Wallerstiner V Moir [1974] there was fraud surrounding the making of a loan to director. The company of which he was a director made a loan to another company which was his ‘puppet’, so the loan should be treated as made to him. 4) Interest of justice. Creasey V Breachwood Motors Ltd [1993] an employee successfully claimed unfair dismissal against a company to whom all the assets of the original company, owned by the same individuals, had been transferred. However, the corporate veil can only be pierced if there is some evidence of impropriety or fraud. 5) Conflict viewpoint. In Creasey V Breachwood Motors Ltd [1994] the judge said ‘the power of the court to lift the corporate veil exists. The authorities provide little guidance as to the circumstances in which this power is to be exercised. ’ However, in Williams V Natural Life Health Foods Ltd [1998] the HOL took the view that the corporate veil was sacrosanct and should only be lifted in the most exceptional circumstances. ) In Trustor AB V Smallbon [2001] the def, a managing director had transferred substantial sums to another company. The Chancery Division was prepared to pierce the veil and recognise the receipt by that company as that of the individual in control, because it was used as a device or facade to conceal the true fact. However, in the absence of impropriety or fraud the courts will not pierce the veil. 7) Corporate manslaughter. Gross negligence manslaug hter- is the veil lifted here? Is the veil lifted in case where corporate manslaughter is established?

Essay about A Comparison of Impressionism and...

A Comparison of Impressionism and Post-Impressionism In this essay, I will contrast and compare the two art movements, Impressionism, and Post-Impressionism. I will be concentrating on the works of the two leading artists of these styles Claude Monet and Vincent van Gogh. The impressionist movement is often considered to mark the beginning of the modern period of art. It was developed in France during the late 19th century. The impressionist movement arose out of dissatisfaction with the classical, dull subjects and clean cut precise techniques of painting. They preferred to paint outdoors concentrating more on landscapes and street scenes, and began to paint ordinary everyday people and liked to show the effects in natural light.†¦show more content†¦This is where we can see the painting still holding onto a touch of the more classical style, but is achieved in a much more impressionistic fashion the mood of the painting is quite peaceful and calming, and the relaxed people and light colours give it a happy and uplifting feel. I think that Monet through his painting was trying to capture a typical laid back French scene. He is also trying to break away from the paintings of the past, that were more sombre and didn?t show ordinary people and their lives. I really enjoyed studying this painting and feel that Monet has created a piece which has many interesting and intriguing features and touches, such as the light bouncing across the water, and shows what a skilled and talented painter he was. The Road-Bridge at Argentil painted in 1874 was another of Claude Monet?s pieces. It is of a river scene, which has a small sailing boat as its main point of interest. The boat is painted in just a dark shade but this contrasts well with the lighter surroundings. We look on this piece from the riverbank, with the small boat perfectly positioned just slightly to the left, which allows us to have an uninterrupted view of the long bridge with its different shapes and curves. The bridge helps give an impression of perspective and leads your eye onto the house, small boat and riverbank in the background. TheShow MoreRelatedLes Grands Boulevard And La Grande Jatte1161 Words   |  5 PagesThrough my analysis and comparison of Les Grands Boulevard and La Grande Jatte I hope to convey to the reader that these two paintings, although painted in different styles, both illustrate the need to slow down and enjoy life. Les Grands Boulevards is a 20 1/2 x 25in. European oil on canvas painting c reated by Pierre-Auguste Renoir in 1875 during the impressionism movement (â€Å"Philadelphia Museum of Art†). The painting is currently housed in the Philadelphia Museum of Art (â€Å"Philadelphia Museum ofRead MoreElisabeth Condon’s Nocturne vs. Vincent van Gogh’s The Starry Night1393 Words   |  6 Pagesfirst drew me to select Elisabeth Condon’s Nocturne (Bob Rauschenberg Gallery) and Vincent van Gogh’s The Starry Night (Frank 348) for this research paper. Initially I wanted to pick two pieces that were different enough in order to form a decent comparison and yet alike enough to connect them in some way. In the art gallery, Nocturne gave me a feeling similar to the one I experienced when I first saw The Starry Night; there was something otherworldly and mystical about it. It made you look at aRead MoreImpressionism vs Post - impressionism1880 Words   |  8 Pagesï » ¿ Impressionism vs Post Impressionism Modern culture is believed to be the brainchild of two versions of the Protestant worldview: the northern French positivism and irrationalism. If the first is trying to discern the signs of the afterlife in the image of reality (which is actually a reflection of the culture established meanings)Read More##arison Of Camille PissarrosThe Goose Girl At Montfoucalt, White Frost1460 Words   |  6 Pagesdirectly into the painting. The nature of the geese as well as the maiden in the photo make it appear as if they were candidly captured with a camera in the middle of their daily routine. Unlike the Renaissance or other art periods that preceded Impressionism, the goal of the painting was not to convey any ideas, political beliefs, or promote one’s nationalism. The goal in this essence was to create a painting that captured a ‘scene’, which was done eloquently enough to allow the viewer to ‘transplant’Read Morestarry night analysis954 Words   |  4 Page sï » ¿Vincent Van Gogh’s artwork ‘starry night’ is a classic example of the post impressionism movement. Post-impressionist were artist who rebelled against the limitations of impressionism. They developed person styles that focus on emotional, structural, symbolic and spiritual elements they felt were missing from impressionism. ‘Starry Night’ was created in 1889, earlier that year Van Gogh decided to enter the asylum at Saint-Rà ©my. ‘Starry night’ was inspired by the view from his window in the asylumRead MoreMuseum Report on Houses of Parliament: Effect of Fog, London by Claude Monet728 Words   |  3 PagesMuseum Report 1. St. Petersburg Museum of Fine Arts, September 28, 2013, 11:00AM 2. Houses of Parliament: Effect of Fog, London 3. Claude Monet 4. 1904 5. Impressionism 6. Primarily cool blues with hints of green to enhance the subject, mostly a very light sky-blue mixed with white, progressing all the way to pale cerulean. The effect of fog detailed in the scene mutes the colors, lending the sfumato effect to the whole piece. 7. Landscape 8. Self; this and many others of the Palace of WestminsterRead MoreEssay about 19th Century Art1240 Words   |  5 Pageswith the pathos of time, change, distance and the past† (221). He also made it clear that he hoped to see the day when painting becomes â€Å"a regularly taught profession . . . scientific as well as poetic† and that the imagination â€Å"cannot stand by a comparison with reality† (Peillex 189), which indicates that Constable was thinking of realism some fifty years before it became an entirely new phenomenon in the art world. The Impressionists sought to create the illusion of forms bathed in light and atmosphereRead MoreComparative Art: A Progression from Realism to Impressionism1352 Words   |  5 Pagesï » ¿Realism to Impressionism 1 Realism to Impressionism: A Progression The 19th century was a time of radical change and innovation in nearly every aspect of society. The Industrial Revolution changed the face of transportation, business, and science. A race for resources and power among European nations led to colonization of the most remote areas of the world. Old political structures stumbled while new ones like Communism took root. The arts were not immune to this climate of change. LiteratureRead MoreClaude Debussy Essay examples1707 Words   |  7 PagesHe was accompanied with great composers such as Tchaikovsky and Meck. He traveled to places such as Europe and Russia. He furthered his studies in Rome after â€Å"receiving a scholarship to the Acadà ©mie des Beaux-Arts† (Lockspeiser). â€Å"He held no formal posts after his youth, appeared in public only sporadically as a pianist or conductor, and left behind no direct pupils† (Bonds). Nevertheless, Debussy pieces were wildly known and still growing in popularity today. â€Å"Hi s death was widely mourned throughoutRead MoreStarry Night a Paint by Vincent Van Gogh Essay1823 Words   |  8 PagesLastly, The paper will further examine two accounts or interpretations of Starry Night from art historians. Biography Vincent was an influential post-Impressionist painter born in 1853, Netherlands. With Theo van Gogh’s association, Vincent met reputable Impressionist painters such as Émile Henri Bernard and Eugà ¨ne Henri Paul Gauguin. Impressionism served as a platform for Vincent in developing his own style . He explored with colours, a stark contrast from his usual dark and sombre style. The